Talk:Music Inspired by Watership Down

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Music Inspired by Watership Down. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

rationale was given

Check the edit summary and I removed a line space. Sikonmina (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given that most of the statements that the DPRP.net citations are supporting are hardly controversial -- it was Hansson's fourth solo album, it's inspired by Watership Down, it wasn't Hansson's first album inspired by a book etc -- I don't see that using the website as a sorce is really a problem. Furthermore, DPRP.net doesn't really count as "user-generated content", since it features writing by a team of experts on Progressive Rock (many of whome have had pieces published in various music magazines) and, with over 20,000 unique monthly visitors since 1995, clearly it is a popular and respected source on all things Prog. DPRP.net is certainly a niche online magazine, but it has a team of regular contributors and high standards of editorial oversight. It is not a UGC. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 11:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]